<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>owngadget.com&#187; Lumix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://owngadget.com/tag/lumix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://owngadget.com</link>
	<description>Tech News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 03:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How would you change Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix DFC-GF2?</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2011/02/26/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2011/02/26/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFC-GF2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re drowning in interchangeable lens options, but that&#8217;s far from being a bad thing. For those that finally caved and picked up Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix DFC-GF2, we&#8217;re interested to see how you&#8217;d change things if given that golden opportunity. Are you satisfied with the size, weight and design? How&#8217;s the low-light performance? Would you alter anything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/25/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/gf2-3d.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>We&#8217;re drowning in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/interchangeablelens/">interchangeable lens</a> options, but that&#8217;s far from being a bad thing. For those that finally caved and picked up Panasonic&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/19/panasonic-lumix-gf2-reviewed-smaller-simpler-and-arguably-bet/">Lumix DFC-GF2</a>,  we&#8217;re interested to see how you&#8217;d change things if given that golden  opportunity. Are you satisfied with the size, weight and design? How&#8217;s  the low-light performance? Would you alter anything about the lens  selection? Introduce a version that changes colors with the seasons? Go  on and get creative in comments below &#8212; the GF3 needs some ideas, you  know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2011/02/26/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix GH2 now shipping in America</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/23/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/23/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GH2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not exactly November, but those who pre-ordered early may still end up with a Lumix GH2 beneath their tree. The highly-anticipated GH1 followup &#8212; which was introduced back at Photokina &#8212; has officially begun to ship to end users in the USA. The official order page shows a one to two week wait, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/22/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/lumix-gh2-shipping.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s not exactly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/panasonic-lumix-gh2-officially-debuts-16mp-1080p-movie-mode/">November</a>,  but those who pre-ordered early may still end up with a Lumix GH2  beneath their tree. The highly-anticipated GH1 followup &#8212; which was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/panasonic-lumix-gh2-officially-debuts-16mp-1080p-movie-mode/">introduced</a> back at Photokina &#8212; has officially begun to ship to end users in the  USA. The official order page shows a one to two week wait, but we&#8217;ve  confirmed with Panny itself (as well as tipster Nate, the proud owner  of the one above) that units are indeed trickling out as we speak. For  those in need of a refresher, this Micro Four Thirds shooter packs a 16  megapixel sensor, 1080p movie mode, SDXC support and an ISO range from  160 to 12,800. Feel free to take a peek back at our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/22/panasonic-lumix-gh2-and-3d-interchangeable-lens-hands-on/">hands-on from Germany</a>,  and make sure you cancel those holiday plans STAT &#8212; wouldn&#8217;t want this  sitting on your doorstep for a solid week, now would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/23/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lumix DMC-LX5 review roundup: great hardware for a not-so-great price</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/09/07/lumix-dmc-lx5-review-roundup-great-hardware-for-a-not-so-great-price/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/09/07/lumix-dmc-lx5-review-roundup-great-hardware-for-a-not-so-great-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[: great hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-LX5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=3425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reviews are starting to trickle out for Pansonic&#8217;s LX3 successor, the DMC-LX5, and so far they all seem to echo similar sentiment. The form factor hearkens back to its Micro Four Thirds darling GF1, at least from the top, with &#8220;dinky buttons&#8221; (in CNET UK&#8217;s words) on the back reminding you of its point-and-shoot bloodline. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/06/lumix-dmc-lx5-review-roundup-great-hardware-for-a-not-so-great/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/lumix-2010-jul-01-hands_600x398.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>Reviews are starting to trickle out for Pansonic&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/LX3/">LX3</a> successor, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lx5">DMC-LX5</a>, and so far they all seem to echo similar sentiment. The form factor hearkens back to its Micro Four Thirds darling <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/GF1/">GF1</a>, at least from the top, with &#8220;dinky buttons&#8221; (in <em>CNET UK&#8217;s</em> words) on the back reminding you of its point-and-shoot bloodline. The  pictures are solid if not characteristically warm &#8212; and the ability to  simultaneously produce RAW and JPEG files is a nice touch &#8212; as is the  choice of either Motion JPEG or AVCHD Lite video. The universal issue  with this camera is the price; that £449.99 tag (the equivalent of $691  in US currency) doesn&#8217;t quite seem to match the offerings, especially  when it&#8217;s about on par with entry-level DSLRs with interchangeable  lenses (albeit without the slim look). As <em>PhotographyBLOG</em> puts  it, Panny&#8217;s gotta hard case to make for a camera &#8220;that looks, at first  glance to be very similar to a £299 model.&#8221; Hey, a hardware switch for  changing the aspect ratio (just above lens barrel; 4:3, 3:2, 16:9, or  1:1) doesn&#8217;t come cheap. Much more detail can be found in the reviews  below.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> It&#8217;s worth mentioning that this camera can be had for $500 at Amazon right now. Still pricey, but not $700 pricey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/09/07/lumix-dmc-lx5-review-roundup-great-hardware-for-a-not-so-great-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 reviewed, premium features warrant its premium price</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/07/15/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g2-reviewed-premium-features-warrant-its-premium-price/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/07/15/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g2-reviewed-premium-features-warrant-its-premium-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raymond.J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-G2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=3122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another entrant has entered the Micro Four Thirds ring, and it&#8217;s Panasonic delivering the Lumix DMC-G2 &#8212; a new shooter with similar still performance but, this time, some rather nice enhancements, the most major being a three-inch articulating touchscreen. You can control some aspects of the camera with a touch, perhaps most useful being tap-to-focus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g2-reviewed-premium-features-warrant-its-pr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/dmc-g2-20100709.jpg" border="0" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 reviewed, premium features warrant its  premium price" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>Another entrant has entered the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MicroFourThirds/">Micro Four Thirds</a> ring, and it&#8217;s Panasonic delivering the Lumix DMC-G2 &#8212; a new shooter  with similar still performance but, this time, some rather nice  enhancements, the most major being a three-inch articulating  touchscreen. You can control some aspects of the camera with a touch,  perhaps most useful being tap-to-focus augmented by the camera keeping  focus on whatever you tapped on, even if it moves around. But, a full  suite of physical buttons and dials still await your fingers, enabling  you to tweak settings without fiddling with menus. The 720p video  recording now supports AVCHD, giving your SDHC or SDXC memory card a  break, and there&#8217;s an input for an optional stereo mic. Ultimately still  performance here is said to be identical to Panasonic&#8217;s more  budget-minded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dmc-g10">DMC-G10</a>,  which clocks in $200 cheaper than the G2&#8242;s MSRP of $799, but lacks 720p  video and the fancy touchscreen. Worth the extra cost? That depends on  how deep your pockets are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/07/15/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g2-reviewed-premium-features-warrant-its-premium-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix DMC-G10 camera finally gets the review we&#8217;ve been waiting for</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/04/22/panasonics-lumix-dmc-g10-camera-finally-gets-the-review-weve-been-waiting-for/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/04/22/panasonics-lumix-dmc-g10-camera-finally-gets-the-review-weve-been-waiting-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raymond.J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-G10 camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=2610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lumix G10 got pricing and a vague date yesterday, and now the first full review has finally graced the interwebs. Photography Blog put this $599, 12 megapixel Micro Four Thirds camera (and its 14 &#8211; 42mm kit lens) through a full suite of tests and came away generally impressed. The addition of 720p video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/panasonic_lumix_dmc_g10_review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/lumix-g10-20100420.jpg" border="0" alt="Panasonic's Lumix DMC-G10 finally gets the review we've been  waiting for" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>The Lumix G10 got <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/panasonic-announces-pricing-availability-for-lumix-g2-g10/">pricing  and a vague date</a> yesterday, and now the first full review has  finally graced the interwebs. <em>Photography Blog</em> put this $599,  12 megapixel Micro Four Thirds camera (and its 14 &#8211; 42mm kit lens)  through a full suite of tests and came away generally impressed. The  addition of 720p video recording makes this model an easy choice over  the older <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/panasonic,g1">G1</a>,  despite the subtraction of a few features and the tilting LCD. But, the  upcoming $800 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/panasonic,g2">G2</a> offers all those features plus 720p video recording as well, making it  perhaps a better choice for more serious shooters with deeper pockets.  Still, the G10 looks to be a great option for those wanting affordable  DSLR power and HD video recording in a (reasonably) svelte package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/04/22/panasonics-lumix-dmc-g10-camera-finally-gets-the-review-weve-been-waiting-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic gets official with Lumix DMC-G2 and DMC-G10 Micro Four Thirds cameras</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/03/11/panasonic-gets-official-with-lumix-dmc-g2-and-dmc-g10-micro-four-thirds-cameras/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/03/11/panasonic-gets-official-with-lumix-dmc-g2-and-dmc-g10-micro-four-thirds-cameras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raymond.J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-G10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-G2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=2299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panasonic has the news day all to itself with its newfangled pair of Micro Four Thirds shooters, and in case you were wondering &#8212; yeah, this is the exact same duo that we saw slip out on Friday. Up first is the Lumix DMC-G2, which looks an awful lot like the G1 it replaces and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/lumix-g10.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Panasonic/">Panasonic</a> has the news day all to itself with its newfangled pair of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MicroFourThirds/">Micro Four Thirds</a> shooters, and in case you were wondering &#8212; yeah, this is the exact same duo that we saw <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/panasonic-leaks-own-g2-and-g10-micro-four-thirds-cams-in-macro-f/">slip out</a> on Friday. Up first is the Lumix DMC-G2, which looks an awful lot like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/01/panasonics-micro-four-thirds-lumix-dmc-g1-reviewed-only-knock/">G1</a> it replaces and is touted as the first interchangable lens system camera with touch-control shooting. Granted, we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/12/canon-powershot-sd980-is-unboxing-and-impressions/">haven&#8217;t exactly warmed</a> to the idea of using a touchpanel to fire off a shot, but hey, it is what it is. Other specs include a 12.1 megapixel Live MOS sensor, Venus Engine HD II technology, a 3-inch rear LCD and a 720p (AVCHD Lite) movie mode, though curiously enough a price and release date eludes us. Moving on, there&#8217;s the DMC-G10, which is supposedly the &#8220;world&#8217;s lightest&#8221; interchangeable lens camera with a viewfinder; this one packs the same 12.1 megapixel sensor and Venus Engine HD II as on the G2, but the 3-inch LCD lacks tilt / swivel / touch options. We&#8217;re still waiting on pricing for this one as well, but now is as good a time as any to mention that both fully support those obnoxiously expensive <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SDXC/">SDXC</a> cards. Huzzah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/03/11/panasonic-gets-official-with-lumix-dmc-g2-and-dmc-g10-micro-four-thirds-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic churns out DMC-FX66, DMC-TS2, DMC-ZS5, DMC-ZS7 and DMC-ZR3 Lumix compacts</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/01/27/panasonic-churns-out-dmc-fx66-dmc-ts2-dmc-zs5-dmc-zs7-and-dmc-zr3-lumix-compacts/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/01/27/panasonic-churns-out-dmc-fx66-dmc-ts2-dmc-zs5-dmc-zs7-and-dmc-zr3-lumix-compacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raymond.J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-FX66]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-TS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-ZS5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMC-ZS7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panasonic&#8216;s just announced quite a handful of Lumix compact cameras, featuring both the new Venus Engine VI and Venus Engine HD II that claim to perform quicker with better noise reduction. What&#8217;s more exciting is that these are all compatible with the forthcoming SDXC cards too, but check out their &#8220;Happy Mode&#8221; &#8212; it makes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/panasonic-lumix-01262010.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/panasonic">Panasonic</a>&#8216;s just announced quite a handful of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lumix">Lumix</a> compact cameras, featuring both the new Venus Engine VI and Venus Engine HD II that claim to perform quicker with better noise reduction. What&#8217;s more exciting is that these are all compatible with the forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sdxc">SDXC</a> cards too, but check out their &#8220;Happy Mode&#8221; &#8212; it makes photos &#8220;more vivid and true to the color of the scene you memorized.&#8221; Yeah, as if we&#8217;d want photos that are more, um, real.</div>
<div><span id="more-1876"></span>Anyway, let&#8217;s break it down here (clockwise from top left; non-US model numbers in brackets):</div>
<ul>
<li><strong>DMC-FX66</strong>: This one&#8217;s a 14.1 megapixel slim camera with an F2.8-5.9 25-125mm (5x zoom) ultra-wide-angle lens (with Power O.I.S lens-shift stabilization). The 720p video capture and 1.06 second start-up time are sweet too, but no <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AVCHD+Lite">AVCHD Lite</a> here. On the back there&#8217;s a 2.7-inch 230k-dot screen with wide viewing angle. All this is just 5.11 ounces including battery.</li>
<li><strong>DMC-TS2</strong> (FT2): This camera has a lot in common with the FX66 above &#8212; same sensor, same image stabilization, same scene modes (but with three extra), same focus modes and same screen. The main differences are its AVCHD Lite 720p video format, F3.3-5.9 28-128mm (4.6x) lens and added ruggedness &#8212; waterproof to 10m, shockproof to 2m, freezeproof to 14 degrees Fahrenheit and dustproof. It&#8217;s of course slightly heavier too &#8212; 6.63 ounces including battery.</li>
<li><strong>DMC-ZS5 </strong>(TZ8) and <strong>DMC-ZS7</strong> (TZ10): These two appear to be twins, except the former has a smaller screen (2.7-inch with 230k dots instead of 3-inch with 460k dots) and lacks GPS, AVCHD Lite and mini-HDMI port. Both do 12.1 megapixel pictures and 720p videos, have F3.3-4.9 25-300mm (12x) lens with lens-shift stabilization, and have identical scene and focus modes. With battery these weigh 7.55 ounces and 7.69 ounces respectively.</li>
<li><strong>DMC-ZR3</strong> (ZX3): Whoa! Another 14.1 megapixel camera which does AVCHD Lite. The specs are almost identical to the TS2 except for the lens (F3.3-5.9 25-200mm 8x ultra-wide-angle) and lack of ruggedness. It weighs 5.61 ounces with battery.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/01/27/panasonic-churns-out-dmc-fx66-dmc-ts2-dmc-zs5-dmc-zs7-and-dmc-zr3-lumix-compacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

