<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>owngadget.com&#187; Panasonic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://owngadget.com/tag/panasonic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://owngadget.com</link>
	<description>Tech News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic ToughBook C1 gets upgraded with faster processor, better battery life</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2011/06/24/panasonic-toughbook-c1-gets-upgraded-with-faster-processor-better-battery-life/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2011/06/24/panasonic-toughbook-c1-gets-upgraded-with-faster-processor-better-battery-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ToughBook C1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may not look any different from the outside, but Panasonic has made some not insignificant upgrades to its rugged, 12.1-inch ToughBook C1 convertible tablet. That starts off with a new Intel Core i5-2520M vPro processor (2.5GHz, Turbo Boost-able to 3.2GHz), along with a standard 320GB 7,200 rpm hard drive (up from 250GB before), and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/23/panasonic-toughbook-c1-gets-upgraded-with-faster-processor-bette/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/toughbook-c1-convertible-tabletsmall.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<div>It may not look any different from the outside, but Panasonic has made  some not insignificant upgrades to its rugged, 12.1-inch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/02/panasonic-slips-core-i5-into-worlds-lightest-12-1-inch-toughb/">ToughBook C1</a> convertible tablet. That starts off with a new Intel Core i5-2520M vPro  processor (2.5GHz, Turbo Boost-able to 3.2GHz), along with a standard  320GB 7,200 rpm hard drive (up from 250GB before), and some improved  battery life &#8212; Panasonic says you can expect twelve hours from a pair  of hot-swappable batteries, or six hours with one. It also says its  various improvements contribute to a start-up time that&#8217;s 30 percent  faster than the previous model, although that will obviously vary in  real world use. Somewhat unfortunately, the convertible&#8217;s base price tag  has also seen a slight upgrade &#8212; it&#8217;ll now start at $2,599 instead of  $2,499 when the new model rolls out next month</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2011/06/24/panasonic-toughbook-c1-gets-upgraded-with-faster-processor-better-battery-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic resurrects Sanyo&#8217;s pistol-grip camcorders, trots out three new models</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2011/05/26/panasonic-resurrects-sanyos-pistol-grip-camcorders-trots-out-three-new-models/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2011/05/26/panasonic-resurrects-sanyos-pistol-grip-camcorders-trots-out-three-new-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol-grip camcorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanyo's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three new models]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worried that Panasonic would kill off Sanyo&#8217;s signature pistol-grip camcorders after it bought its rival last year? Fear not &#8212; Panny just went and resurrected Sanyo&#8217;s ergonomic design with three new models &#8211; slapping its own brand on &#8216;em, of course. And, in a move that would do Sanyo proud, Panasonic brought back the DMX-CA100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/25/panasonic-resurrects-sanyos-pistol-grip-camcorders-trots-out-t/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/panasonic-trio.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Worried that Panasonic would kill off Sanyo&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Sanyo+xacti/">signature pistol-grip camcorders</a> after it <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/22/panasonics-sanyo-and-pew-buyout-official-subsidiaries-for-life/">bought its rival</a> last year? Fear not &#8212; Panny just went and resurrected Sanyo&#8217;s  ergonomic design with three new models &#8211; slapping its own brand on &#8216;em,  of course. And, in a move that would do Sanyo proud, Panasonic brought  back the DMX-CA100 / VPC-CA100, a 1080p camcorder Sanyo released last  year under the same name. It&#8217;s gotten a spec boost, though, with the  ability to snap 16 megapixel still photos, up from 14.4. The other two  &#8212; the HX-DC15 and the HX-DC1 &#8212; both shoot 1080p video as well, with  the DC15 offering 16GB internal memory and a 16 megapixel sensor, and  the DC1 able to take 14.4 megapixel stills. No word on availability  outside Japan, but we&#8217;re sure those of you with a penchant for flip-out  displays and candy-colored plastic will find a way to snag one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2011/05/26/panasonic-resurrects-sanyos-pistol-grip-camcorders-trots-out-three-new-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 ups the interchangeable lens ante with fancy new touchscreen</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2011/05/14/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g3-ups-the-interchangeable-lens-ante-with-fancy-new-touchscreen/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2011/05/14/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g3-ups-the-interchangeable-lens-ante-with-fancy-new-touchscreen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 08:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fancy new touchscreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interchangeable lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix DMC-G3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right on schedule, Panasonic&#8217;s gone and made its thinly-veiled Lumix DMC-G3 Micro Four Thirds shooter official. The camera succeeds the G2 with a 16 megapixel sensor, support for 1080p AVCHD video recording with stereo audio, 4fps burst shooting at full resolution, and an articulating, 3-inch touchscreen that supplants some of the dials adorning the last-gen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g3-ups-the-interchangeable-lens-ante-wit/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/g3-lead.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>Right on schedule, Panasonic&#8217;s gone and made its thinly-veiled <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g3-leaked-expected-to-launch-tomorrow/">Lumix DMC-G3</a> Micro Four Thirds shooter official. The camera succeeds the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/07/panasonic-gets-official-with-lumix-dmc-g2-and-dmc-g10-micro-four/">G2</a> with a 16 megapixel sensor, support for 1080p AVCHD video recording  with stereo audio, 4fps burst shooting at full resolution, and an  articulating, 3-inch touchscreen that supplants some of the dials  adorning the last-gen model. In addition to poking around menus, you can  touch that display to focus on your subject, and slide your finger to  tweak exposure, white balance, and depth of field &#8212; all in all, not  unlike how you might interact with a smartphone camera. And, at 11.8  ounces, the aluminum-clad body weighs about ten percent less than its  predecessor. Look for it in June for $700 in brown, red, and white &#8212; in  addition to your garden-variety black. In the market for something more  compact? Panny also trotted out the Lumix-FH7, a 16 megapixel  point-and-shoot with 4x optical zoom and 720p movie recording. Oodles of  photos below with a press release after the break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2011/05/14/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g3-ups-the-interchangeable-lens-ante-with-fancy-new-touchscreen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Lumix GH2 review roundup: impressive video recording, murky still images</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2011/03/28/panasonic-lumix-gh2-review-roundup-impressive-video-recording-murky-still-images/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2011/03/28/panasonic-lumix-gh2-review-roundup-impressive-video-recording-murky-still-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impressive video recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix GH2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murky still images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you&#8217;re still wondering if Panasonic&#8217;s mirrorless Lumix GH2 is worth your $900, we&#8217;ve rounded up a handful of reviews to provide a pointer for your next big purchase. While most reviewers agree that this Micro Four Thirds camera appears to be very similar to its predecessor, they universally praise the subtly improved ergonomics,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/27/panasonic-lumix-gh2-review-roundup-impressive-video-recording/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/panasonic-gh2-03272011.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>In case you&#8217;re still wondering if Panasonic&#8217;s mirrorless <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/panasonic-lumix-gh2-officially-debuts-16mp-1080p-movie-mode/">Lumix GH2</a> is worth your $900, we&#8217;ve rounded up a handful of reviews to provide a  pointer for your next big purchase. While most reviewers agree that this  Micro Four Thirds camera appears to be very similar to its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/gh1">predecessor</a>,  they universally praise the subtly improved ergonomics, speedy liveview  autofocusing, and refined image quality, especially with its 1080p  AVCHD video recording (although <em>Digital Camera Resource Page</em> did notice some artifacting in its clips). Noise is also a non-issue up  to about ISO 800 or 1600, though it&#8217;s apparent that the 16 megapixel  stills are comparatively dull and, like those from many other MFTs,  aren&#8217;t quite on par with DSLRs &#8212; expect plenty of manual processing  work here, as demoed by the good folks over at <em>Digital Photography Review</em>.  All in all, the GH2 is a great kit for high quality video capturing,  bundled with a pretty good still performance that requires some extra  TLC afterwards &#8212; kinda ironic in a way, but hey, this isn&#8217;t a problem  for lovers of video bokeh. Head over to the links below for some  in-depth analysis and walk-through before you leave a small dent on your  bank account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2011/03/28/panasonic-lumix-gh2-review-roundup-impressive-video-recording-murky-still-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How would you change Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix DFC-GF2?</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2011/02/26/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2011/02/26/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFC-GF2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re drowning in interchangeable lens options, but that&#8217;s far from being a bad thing. For those that finally caved and picked up Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix DFC-GF2, we&#8217;re interested to see how you&#8217;d change things if given that golden opportunity. Are you satisfied with the size, weight and design? How&#8217;s the low-light performance? Would you alter anything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/25/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/gf2-3d.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>We&#8217;re drowning in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/interchangeablelens/">interchangeable lens</a> options, but that&#8217;s far from being a bad thing. For those that finally caved and picked up Panasonic&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/19/panasonic-lumix-gf2-reviewed-smaller-simpler-and-arguably-bet/">Lumix DFC-GF2</a>,  we&#8217;re interested to see how you&#8217;d change things if given that golden  opportunity. Are you satisfied with the size, weight and design? How&#8217;s  the low-light performance? Would you alter anything about the lens  selection? Introduce a version that changes colors with the seasons? Go  on and get creative in comments below &#8212; the GF3 needs some ideas, you  know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2011/02/26/how-would-you-change-panasonics-lumix-dfc-gf2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix GH2 now shipping in America</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/23/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/23/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GH2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not exactly November, but those who pre-ordered early may still end up with a Lumix GH2 beneath their tree. The highly-anticipated GH1 followup &#8212; which was introduced back at Photokina &#8212; has officially begun to ship to end users in the USA. The official order page shows a one to two week wait, but]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/22/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/lumix-gh2-shipping.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s not exactly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/panasonic-lumix-gh2-officially-debuts-16mp-1080p-movie-mode/">November</a>,  but those who pre-ordered early may still end up with a Lumix GH2  beneath their tree. The highly-anticipated GH1 followup &#8212; which was <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/panasonic-lumix-gh2-officially-debuts-16mp-1080p-movie-mode/">introduced</a> back at Photokina &#8212; has officially begun to ship to end users in the  USA. The official order page shows a one to two week wait, but we&#8217;ve  confirmed with Panny itself (as well as tipster Nate, the proud owner  of the one above) that units are indeed trickling out as we speak. For  those in need of a refresher, this Micro Four Thirds shooter packs a 16  megapixel sensor, 1080p movie mode, SDXC support and an ISO range from  160 to 12,800. Feel free to take a peek back at our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/22/panasonic-lumix-gh2-and-3d-interchangeable-lens-hands-on/">hands-on from Germany</a>,  and make sure you cancel those holiday plans STAT &#8212; wouldn&#8217;t want this  sitting on your doorstep for a solid week, now would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/23/panasonics-lumix-gh2-now-shipping-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3DTV roundup: LG, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Samsung &amp; Sony square off</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/07/3dtv-roundup-lg-mitsubishi-panasonic-samsung-sony-square-off/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/07/3dtv-roundup-lg-mitsubishi-panasonic-samsung-sony-square-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3DTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitsubishi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=4024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a year of hearing about 3DTVs nonstop we finally got some of the main contenders in house to examine, although we&#8217;ll start by pointing out that this isn&#8217;t so much of a &#8220;3DTV&#8221; roundup, since a more apt description of these displays is 3D-capable HDTVs. That&#8217;s an important distinction to make, since nothing about]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/06/3dtv-roundup-lg-mitsubishi-panasonic-samsung-and-sony-square/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/hd.engadget.com/media/2010/11/3dshootout01md.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>After a <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2010/01/21/3d-stole-the-show-at-ces-2010/">year</a> of hearing about 3DTVs nonstop we finally got some of the main  contenders in house to examine, although we&#8217;ll start by pointing out  that this isn&#8217;t so much of a &#8220;3DTV&#8221; roundup, since a more apt  description of these displays is 3D-capable HDTVs. That&#8217;s an important  distinction to make, since nothing about the 2D performance of these TVs  suffers because of their ability to do 3D, and in many cases they cost  the exact same price as their comparable 2D-only models from last year.  With that said Samsung, Sony, Panasonic, Mitsubishi and LG&#8217;s finest have  had their moment and on the next page we&#8217;ve done our best to compare  them in a way that makes sense for the average HDTV buyer who might also  want to take in a 3D event or movie from time to time. Right now,  there&#8217;s barely enough 3D content to support more than a couple of hours  viewing per week, much less support a full viewing conversion to  all-glasses, all the time &#8212; but more about that later. Check out our  full impressions after the break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/12/07/3dtv-roundup-lg-mitsubishi-panasonic-samsung-sony-square-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Lumix GF2 reviewed: smaller, simpler, and arguably better than the GF1</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/11/22/panasonic-lumix-gf2-reviewed-smaller-simpler-and-arguably-better-than-the-gf1/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/11/22/panasonic-lumix-gf2-reviewed-smaller-simpler-and-arguably-better-than-the-gf1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and arguably]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better than the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GF1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix GF2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simpler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=3891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panasonic&#8217;s DMC-GF1 proved itself as a tasty go-between, filling the gap between high-end compact and DSLR. The GF2 will soon arrive and, according to Photography Blog, if anything it slots in a little closer to the compact side of things thanks to a new user interface that ditches many buttons and dials in favor of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/19/panasonic-lumix-gf2-reviewed-smaller-simpler-and-arguably-bet/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/dmc-gf2-2010-11-19.jpg" border="0" alt="Panasonic Lumix GF2 reviewed: smaller, simpler, and arguably better than the GF1" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>Panasonic&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dmc-gf2">DMC-GF1</a> proved itself as a tasty go-between, filling the gap between high-end compact and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dslr">DSLR</a>. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dmc-gf2">GF2</a> will soon arrive and, according to <em>Photography Blog</em>,  if anything it slots in a little closer to the compact side of things  thanks to a new user interface that ditches many buttons and dials in  favor of touchscreen menus. This will drive some users mad, but  ultimately the up-rated features here still make this a worthy choice  over the GF1, including video recording at 1080i60 and a new body that&#8217;s  a fifth smaller and seven percent lighter than before despite still  containing a pop-up flash, 12.1 megapixel sensor, and image quality  that&#8217;s about as good as you&#8217;re going to get out of a shooter this size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/11/22/panasonic-lumix-gf2-reviewed-smaller-simpler-and-arguably-better-than-the-gf1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic says it will start selling Android-based smartphones in Japan next year, overseas in 2012</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/11/17/panasonic-says-it-will-start-selling-android-based-smartphones-in-japan-next-year-overseas-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/11/17/panasonic-says-it-will-start-selling-android-based-smartphones-in-japan-next-year-overseas-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=3839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panasonic may not be new to cellphones, but it has sat out of the smartphone explosion of recent years &#8212; an oversight that it&#8217;s now apparently looking to correct. Speaking at a news conference today, the head of Panasonic&#8217;s mobile division, Osamu Waki, said flatly that the compmany &#8220;misjudged the speed at which smartphones would]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/16/panasonic-says-it-will-start-selling-android-based-smartphones-i/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/panasonic-smartphones-11-16-2010-1289934335.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>Panasonic may not be new to cellphones,  but it has sat out of the smartphone explosion of recent years &#8212; an  oversight that it&#8217;s now apparently looking to correct. Speaking at a  news conference today, the head of Panasonic&#8217;s mobile division, Osamu Waki, said flatly that the compmany &#8220;misjudged  the speed at which smartphones would be taken up in the Japanese  market,&#8221; and that &#8220;with the rapid shift to Android, we want to catch up  quickly.&#8221; Exact details on how it plans to catch up are expectedly still  a bit light, but Panasonic&#8217;s phones will indeed be based on Android,  and it apparently hopes to differentiate them by emphasizing their  networking capabilities with other Panasonic products. As for when the  first ones will roll out, Panasonic plans to kick off sales in Japan  sometime next year, with overseas markets set to follow in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/11/17/panasonic-says-it-will-start-selling-android-based-smartphones-in-japan-next-year-overseas-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic&#8217;s hair-washing robot: rinse, kill, repeat</title>
		<link>http://owngadget.com/2010/09/26/panasonics-hair-washing-robot-rinse-kill-repeat/</link>
		<comments>http://owngadget.com/2010/09/26/panasonics-hair-washing-robot-rinse-kill-repeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlene.L</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair-washing robot: rinse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repeat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owngadget.com/?p=3561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Panasonic can build an exercise horse then surely a robot that washes your hair should come as no surprise. Imagine being lifted from your robotic bed by a plush care-assist robot and placed into a chair for an automatic shampoo and scalp massage. That is the future of care for the elderly and sick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/24/panasonics-hair-washing-robot-rinse-kill-repeat/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/jn100924-1-2.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a></div>
<p>If Panasonic can build an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/30/panasonics-bucking-bronco-fitness-equipment-no-were-not-kidd/">exercise horse</a> then surely a robot that washes your hair should come as no surprise. Imagine being lifted from your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/18/panasonics-robotic-bed-makes-sleeping-with-robots-a-reality/">robotic bed</a> by a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/28/ri-man-the-soft-and-cuddly-robot/">plush care-assist robot</a> and placed into a chair for an automatic shampoo and scalp massage.  That is the future of care for the elderly and sick in Japan, or the  rich and lazy everywhere else. Panasonic&#8217;s hair-washing robot scans each  human head three-dimensionally to apply just the right amount of  pressure during the shampoo, massage, and rinse phases. It recognizes  repeat customers and then applies that person&#8217;s preferred massage course  using its human-like sixteen &#8220;fingers.&#8221; Each arm contains a trio of  motors to power swing, press, and massage motions&#8230; or to snap your  spinal column should you decide to sass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://owngadget.com/2010/09/26/panasonics-hair-washing-robot-rinse-kill-repeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

